Press "Enter" to skip to content

Other

Selected linguistics links:

Completely different stuff:

  • My Erdős number is 4:
    • Aronov, B.; Erdős, P.; Goddard, W.; Kleitman, D. J.; Klugerman, M.; Pach, J.; Schulman, L. J. Crossing families. Combinatorica 14 (1994), no. 2, 127-134.
    • Agarwal, Pankaj K.; Aggarwal, Alok; Aronov, B.Kosaraju, S. Rao; Schieber, Baruch; Suri, Subhash Computing external farthest neighbors for a simple polygon. First Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (Montreal, PQ, 1989). Discrete Appl. Math. 31 (1991), no. 2, 97-111.
    • Joshi, A. K.Kosaraju, S. R.; Yamada, H. M. String adjunct grammars. I. Local and distributed adjunction. Information and Control 21 (1972), 93-116.
    • Shen, L.; Champollion, L.Joshi, A.K. LTAG-spinal and the Treebank: A new resource for incremental, dependency and semantic parsing. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42 (2008), no. 1, 1-19.

The singular includes the plural; the plural includes the singular. “And” as well as “or” shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively, to bring within the scope of this subpoena all responses that might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope. “Each” shall be construed to include “every” and “every” shall be construed to include “each”. “Any” shall be construed to include “all” and “all” shall be construed to include “any.” The use of a verb in any tense shall be construed as the user of the verb in a past or present tense, whenever necessary to bring within the scope of the document request all responses which might otherwise be construed to be outside its scope.

— typical language from a subpoena

css.php